Business Process Management Methodologies
Learn about the most common process improvement methodologies used in BPM—from Lean and Six Sigma to the BPM lifecycle model—and how to apply them effectively across teams.
Introduction
Business process management (BPM) methodologies provide structured approaches to analyzing, improving, and governing how work gets done. While every organization manages processes in some form, formal methodologies bring consistency, repeatability, and measurable outcomes to the effort.
They’re not just theoretical models. These frameworks are applied every day to streamline operations, reduce costs, improve compliance, and enable scale. In many cases, process improvement methodologies—like Lean, Six Sigma, or Kaizen—are adapted into broader process lifecycle initiatives to drive continuous value.
BPM teams and roles—such as business process analysts, managers, and owners—rely on these approaches to create shared understanding, align cross-functional work, and ensure improvements stick over time. Whether your organization is implementing new systems, undergoing digital transformation, or simply maturing its operations, having a structured methodology in place increases the likelihood of success.
→ See related: What is the Value of Business Process Management?
Overview of BPM and process improvement methodologies
Despite their different origins and approaches, all process improvement methodologies share a common goal: making work more efficient, measurable, and aligned with business objectives. Whether you're removing waste, reducing variation, improving customer experiences, or introducing automation, methodologies provide a structured way to do it.
What unites all process improvement methodologies
At their core, process management and improvement methodologies help organizations:
- Understand how work gets done today through process discovery and analysis. This could mean mapping an order-to-cash process to reveal why invoices are delayed or why approvals pile up in one department.
- Design better ways of working with structured process design and implementation. For example, replacing manual handoffs with automated workflows, or redesigning service activation so customers get faster responses.
- Maintain ongoing performance using process governance and optimization, where KPIs, dashboards, and ownership models ensure improvements stick over time.
Methodologies provide a repeatable cycle that prevents “firefighting mode.” Instead of reacting to problems, teams learn to continuously analyze, adjust, and improve processes in a structured way.
When to use a methodology
You don’t need to wait for a full-scale transformation to benefit from a methodology. Even small, targeted improvements gain from having structure.
- Your goals: If the aim is to cut costs, Lean principles can reduce waste and rework; if compliance is the challenge, ISO or ITIL frameworks give structure; if automation is a priority, the BPM lifecycle provides a governance model that ensures automations are scalable.
- Team maturity: A start-up without a formal BPM team might begin with PDCA cycles or Agile sprints to build quick wins. A mature enterprise with a dedicated business process manager can apply Six Sigma or TOGAF to manage cross-departmental complexity.
- Challenges you face: If silos are the main barrier, methodologies that emphasize collaboration (e.g., BPM lifecycle with workshops and shared repositories) help align stakeholders. If outdated workflows are the problem, Lean or Kaizen provide tools for grassroots improvement.
Practical way to start is to run a pilot project before scaling a methodology across the enterprise. For instance, apply Lean in one procurement process, measure the result, and then decide whether to expand.
Methodologies vs. tools
It’s common to confuse BPM methodologies with execution platforms. Methodologies set the approach, while tools make it easier to execute.
- A methodology is the blueprint: it guides thinking and ensures improvements are measurable and repeatable. For example, the Six Sigma DMAIC cycle (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) provides a structured path.
- A tool is the execution layer: it accelerates delivery. With SAP Signavio, teams can document processes, mine execution data, and monitor KPIs within the same environment. Paired with SAP LeanIX, process changes can be tied directly to the IT and application landscape.
Without a methodology, software risks being underused—features like dashboards or modeling libraries may never translate into business outcomes. Without tools, methodologies can remain stuck in workshops and binders.
Combining both ensures that improvements are practical, governed, and embedded in daily operations.
10-Step Guide to Achieving Process and Experience Excellence
All businesses have the same goal: to run at their best. But all too often, there’s a disconnect between operations and experience. What’s missing is an outside-in perspective on operational excellence and transformation efforts. This can help you drive a differentiating edge in the market and ongoing financial success.
Most common BPM and process improvement methodologies
Below are the most widely used methodologies that help organizations design, implement, and optimize their business processes.
Each of these frameworks has a specific focus and is suited to different organizational needs and maturity levels.
1. Business process management lifecycle model
Core Focus: End-to-end management of business processes
Best for: Organizations establishing a foundational BPM practice
The BPM lifecycle is a structured, iterative model that covers the complete process journey. It includes five key stages:
- Process Discovery: Understanding and documenting current processes
- Process Analysis: Identifying bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and risks
- Process Design: Creating optimized to-be workflows and process variants
- Process Implementation: Putting new processes into action using systems, roles, and training
- Process Optimization: Continuously measuring and improving performance
This model is tool-agnostic and can be applied across industries. It supports both strategic initiatives and daily operational improvements, offering flexibility and repeatability at scale.
2. Lean
Core Focus: Eliminating waste and improving flow
Best for: Streamlining operations and improving customer value
Originating from manufacturing (Toyota Production System), Lean helps organizations deliver more value with fewer resources. It focuses on:
- Removing non-value-added activities (waste)
- Shortening lead times
- Empowering frontline teams to solve problems
Lean is widely used in healthcare, logistics, and service sectors to improve speed and efficiency without compromising quality.
3. Six Sigma
Core Focus: Reducing process variation and improving quality
Best for: Organizations focused on data-driven performance improvement
Six Sigma uses statistical tools and the DMAIC cycle (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) to improve processes. It is especially helpful for:
- Reducing defects
- Standardizing outcomes
- Improving customer satisfaction
It often requires certification (e.g., Green Belt, Black Belt) and is common in industries like finance, manufacturing, and telecommunications.
5. Lean Six Sigma
Core Focus: Combining Lean speed with Six Sigma quality
Best for: Companies seeking both efficiency and precision
This hybrid approach merges the waste-reduction mindset of Lean with the analytics-driven rigor of Six Sigma. Lean Six Sigma enables:
- Faster process improvement cycles
- More precise root-cause analysis
- Broader cross-functional buy-in
It’s widely adopted in enterprise environments where both speed and compliance are essential.
5. Kaizen
Core Focus: Continuous, incremental improvement
Best for: Building a culture of improvement at all levels
Kaizen, meaning "change for better" in Japanese, encourages all employees to regularly suggest small changes. While simple, this approach builds long-term momentum. Benefits include:
- Empowered teams
- Reduced resistance to change
- Compounding improvements over time
It’s frequently used in Lean and Agile cultures and complements other methodologies well.
6. Total Quality Management (TQM)
Core Focus: Organization-wide commitment to quality
Best for: Enterprises aligning quality, culture, and performance
TQM integrates quality principles across the company. It emphasizes:
- Customer focus
- Leadership commitment
- Continuous employee engagement
Though less common as a standalone method today, TQM influenced the rise of ISO standards and is still a reference for governance-focused organizations.
7. Theory of Constraints (TOC)
Core Focus: Improving system performance by addressing bottlenecks
Best for: Environments where one process stage limits the entire system
TOC helps organizations identify and elevate constraints (bottlenecks) that hinder output. It’s useful for:
- Operational efficiency
- Workflow redesign
- Throughput optimization
It’s often used alongside Lean or in production-heavy industries.
8. Agile BPM
Core Focus: Iterative, collaborative, and adaptive process improvement
Best for: Digital teams and dynamic business environments
Agile BPM blends Agile project management with BPM practices. It allows teams to:
- Break large changes into sprints
- Test process changes quickly
- Adapt based on feedback and outcomes
Agile BPM is growing in relevance, especially in tech, finance, and organizations with fast-changing needs.
9. Others (less common or complementary methodologies)
In addition to the major methodologies above, several other frameworks are used either in niche industries or to complement broader process improvement efforts. These approaches may not be as widely adopted across all business units but provide value in specific domains, especially IT and compliance-heavy environments.
- Business Process Reengineering (BPR) – A radical redesign approach that focuses on fundamentally rethinking core processes for breakthrough improvements in cost, speed, or quality.
- ISO 9001 – A quality management standard that emphasizes consistent processes, customer focus, and continuous improvement—often used in regulated or manufacturing environments.
- PDCA (Plan–Do–Check–Act) – A foundational iterative cycle used in many continuous improvement contexts. Also known as the Deming Cycle.
- Baldrige Excellence Framework – A performance management framework that integrates strategy, operations, and results. Common in public sector and healthcare.
- Hoshin Kanri – A goal deployment methodology that connects strategic planning with daily management practices, often used in Lean environments.
- Benchmarking – A comparative practice (not a full methodology) for identifying process gaps by analyzing best-in-class organizations.
- ITIL (Information Technology Infrastructure Library) – A framework focused on IT service management, but it includes defined processes for service delivery, support, and continuous improvement. Frequently adopted in enterprise IT organizations where BPM intersects with service design and operations.
- COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) – A governance and management framework for enterprise IT. It helps organizations align IT goals with business strategy and manage risks associated with digital transformation and compliance. While not a pure BPM methodology, it includes process models and controls that impact business operations.
These complementary frameworks are often layered on top of—or used in conjunction with—broader BPM methodologies, especially in organizations where IT governance, regulatory compliance, or enterprise-wide consistency is critical.
BPM Resources
Unlock hidden value in your business processes
Explore the results of our 'value challenge' initiative that demonstrates the hidden value organizations can uncover in their business processes by using BPM solutions.
A Practical Guide for Designing Optimal Business Processes
A modeling guidelines to help you create processes in a uniform way and present them comprehensibly for your whole team.
Process Mapping Basics
Find out how to get started with process mapping, and how to introduce business process management (BPM) concepts to your organization.
A Comprehensive Guide to Process Mining
Learn what process mining is, the value it offers, and why now is the right time to launch your own process mining initiative.
Choosing the right process management methodology
There is no one-size-fits-all methodology. The right approach depends on your organization’s process maturity, strategic goals, industry requirements, and team capabilities. Some organizations even blend multiple methodologies—such as combining Lean with BPMN modeling or applying Six Sigma tools within an Agile process framework.
The key is to choose a method that fits your reality rather than forcing the organization into a rigid mold and factor these in:
1. Process maturity level
Organizations at different maturity stages need different levels of structure. A start-up or a business scaling rapidly may not have the resources for formal governance and will gain more from lightweight methods such as Agile sprints or PDCA cycles, where improvements can be rolled out quickly and tested in real time.
By contrast, a global enterprise with thousands of employees and strict audit requirements may need the discipline of the BPM lifecycle or ISO-based frameworks, where process ownership, documentation, and compliance checkpoints are formalized.
2. Strategic goals
The right methodology often depends on what you want to achieve:
- For cost reduction, Lean or Six Sigma provide proven approaches for cutting waste and reducing defects. A manufacturing company, for example, may use Lean to reduce overproduction and Six Sigma to address recurring quality issues.
- For scalability and automation, structured frameworks like the BPM lifecycle are better suited, since they emphasize governance, modeling standards, and integration with automation platforms.
- For compliance and control, methodologies like ITIL, ISO, or COBIT offer built-in mechanisms for accountability, change tracking, and risk management—critical for industries such as finance or healthcare.
3. Organizational structure and skills
Methodologies must fit the people expected to use them. A small operations team without certification may struggle with Six Sigma’s statistical rigor or TOGAF’s enterprise architecture approach, but they can quickly apply Agile ceremonies (like retrospectives) or PDCA loops to drive change.
In contrast, a mature operations excellence team may invest in training and certification to fully implement Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, or ITIL practices across the enterprise.
4. Tooling and software support
The availability of supporting software often determines how quickly a methodology delivers results. For example, the BPM lifecycle is easier to adopt when supported by a modeling platform like SAP Signavio Transformation Suite, which provides governance, notation standards, and repositories.
Lean principles can be reinforced through dashboards and KPIs in analytics tools, while Agile teams often rely on workflow automation platforms for iterative delivery.
Conceptual frameworks without strong tooling support may remain theoretical unless supplemented by practical systems.
When to blend methodologies
Hybrid models are increasingly common in complex enterprises. Few organizations follow one methodology exclusively because business challenges often span multiple needs.
- Lean Six Sigma merges Lean’s focus on waste elimination with Six Sigma’s defect control, making it effective in manufacturing or service environments where efficiency and quality matter equally.
- BPM + Agile allows process improvement initiatives to be broken into smaller sprints, where new workflows are tested and refined with end users before full rollout. This approach is common in digital transformation programs.
- ITIL + BPMN combines IT service management best practices with visual process modeling, creating transparency for IT workflows while ensuring they align with broader business processes.
What matters most is not textbook adherence but whether the chosen approach helps your organization analyze, improve, and govern processes with measurable business outcomes. A methodology is only successful if it delivers results that employees can adopt, leaders can measure, and the business can sustain over time.
Challenges and pitfalls
While business process management (BPM) methodologies offer structure and value, applying them incorrectly—or at the wrong time—can limit their impact or even cause resistance across the organization.
Understanding the common challenges helps teams avoid missteps and apply the right methodology for the right context.
1. Misalignment between goals and methodology
Not every methodology fits every organization. For example, Lean might be ideal for frontline operational improvements, while BPMN or Six Sigma may be better suited for structured, high-complexity processes.
- Choosing the wrong methodology can slow progress or complicate execution.
- Teams may become frustrated if the framework doesn’t align with their way of working or business maturity.
Start with a clear definition of business goals and process maturity before selecting a methodology. If the goal is efficiency, Lean may fit; if compliance is the priority, ITIL or ISO works better. Use maturity assessments and pilot projects to test fit before scaling.
2. Overengineering and unnecessary complexity
Some teams fall into the trap of using methodologies as an end in themselves rather than a means to an outcome.
- Over-documenting processes without clear ownership or improvement goals can waste time.
- Excessive modeling can distract from solving real operational problems.
The goal isn’t to have the best diagrams—it’s to make work simpler, faster, and more reliable. Apply a “fit-for-purpose” rule: document processes only to the level of detail needed to drive decisions or improvements. Use tools like BPM tools for governance, but set modeling standards that balance thoroughness with usability.
3. Resistance to change
Even the best methodology won’t succeed without cultural support.
- Employees may see methodologies as bureaucratic or top-down if not properly introduced.
- Lack of communication and involvement can create barriers to adoption.
- Leadership needs to support the change and set expectations early.
Involve employees early through workshops, feedback loops, and pilots. Position the methodology as a tool to make their work easier, not harder. Combine this with change management practices—training, communication, and leadership sponsorship—to create buy-in.
4. Lack of leadership buy-in
Sustainable BPM requires ongoing executive support. Without it, teams struggle to prioritize improvement work, secure resources, or enforce standards.
- Process teams may work in silos without visibility.
- Improvements may stall after initial rollout.
- Governance models may not be adopted consistently.
Secure a C-level sponsor such as the COO or CIO to champion BPM initiatives. Tie outcomes directly to strategic goals (e.g., cost savings, compliance scores, transformation milestones) so executives see BPM as a lever for business success rather than a side project.
5. Treating BPM as a one-time project
A common pitfall is treating BPM as a project with a beginning and an end rather than a continuous capability.
- Companies often celebrate a single process improvement but fail to extend efforts to other processes.
- External factors—like new regulations, AI-driven changes, or disruptions such as COVID-19—quickly make “finished” processes outdated.
- Viewing BPM as a one-off initiative limits its ability to build resilience and competitiveness.
Position BPM as an ongoing discipline embedded into the process lifecycle. Establish continuous monitoring, governance structures, and improvement cycles so the organization can adapt as circumstances change. This ensures BPM becomes a sustainable capability rather than a temporary project.
BPMN 2.0 poster
The uniform documentation of processes is vital for all organizations to provide a clear definition of responsibilities and manage key data in a structured manner. Our BPMN 2.0 poster offers daily support to document processes transparently, to avoid misunderstandings and to sustainably improve processes.
Future of BPM methodologies
BPM methodologies are shifting toward greater flexibility as organizations adapt to AI, data-driven decision-making, and agile operating models. Instead of following one strict method, teams increasingly blend elements of Lean, Six Sigma, and lifecycle models, using process mining and real-time insights to guide their choices.
AI accelerates this shift by detecting inefficiencies, predicting outcomes, and assisting with modeling and governance, while agile practices encourage faster, iterative improvements that engage users earlier and reduce risk.
Together, these trends point to a future where BPM methodologies are less about rigid frameworks and more about enabling continuous, adaptive improvement.
Practical, Detailed, and Convenient Guide for Optimal Business Processes
Get the most important standards, ready for you to modify and adapt according to your own standards and organizational needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which methodology is commonly used for process improvement?
Lean and Six Sigma are among the most widely adopted process improvement methodologies. Lean focuses on reducing waste, while Six Sigma emphasizes quality and consistency. Many organizations also use the BPM lifecycle model to structure continuous improvement efforts.
Is BPM an agile methodology?
What is the difference between Agile and BPM?
What is the ideal process improvement model?
Can you use agile for process improvement?
What is the Six Sigma methodology of process improvement?