BPM Implementation Checklist
A practical guide to BPM implementation. Learn how to execute business process management step by step, embed workflows into daily operations, involve teams, and scale process improvements across the organization.
en
What is BPM implementation?
BPM implementation is the execution of business process management in daily operations. It focuses on applying BPM strategy by documenting processes, improving how work is done, training teams, and embedding processes into tools and systems.
Unlike BPM strategy, which defines goals and governance, BPM implementation is about carrying out process discovery, modeling, redesign, and monitoring in real environments. Organizations usually start implementation when processes become inconsistent, hard to scale, or difficult to measure.
Within the BPM lifecycle, implementation connects process design with execution and optimization, making processes usable, measurable, and continuously improved rather than static documentation.
Prerequisites
BPM implementation is most effective when a few practical conditions are already clear.
Teams should understand why BPM is being implemented, which outcomes matter, and where to start. There should also be basic clarity around who owns processes, who supports implementation, and how decisions will be made.
Implementation efforts benefit from knowing the organization’s current ability to document, govern, and improve processes. Teams at an early stage often begin with documentation and standardization, while more advanced organizations focus on automation, performance data, and optimization. Awareness of this readiness helps avoid pushing changes that cannot yet be sustained.
Finally, implementation works best with a focused scope and a realistic view of available tools and data. Starting with a small number of well-understood processes allows teams to test their approach, build confidence, and refine ways of working before expanding BPM across the organization.
→ Related: What Makes a Successful BPM Implementation?
10-Step Guide to Achieving Process and Experience Excellence
All businesses have the same goal: to run at their best. But all too often, there’s a disconnect between operations and experience. What’s missing is an outside-in perspective on operational excellence and transformation efforts. This can help you drive a differentiating edge in the market and ongoing financial success.
Step-by-step BPM implementation
BPM implementation progresses through a sequence of practical steps. Each step has a clear purpose and produces outputs that are required for the next one. Skipping steps or compressing them usually results in low adoption, outdated documentation, or improvements that never translate into daily work.
The example used throughout this section is employee onboarding in a mid-size organization.
1. Set scope and select pilot processes
Implementation starts by deliberately limiting scope. Teams identify a small number of candidate processes and evaluate them based on frequency, business impact, number of handoffs, and current pain points. The goal is to choose a process that is representative enough to test BPM practices, but not so complex that it becomes unmanageable.
At this stage, teams also define clear boundaries. They agree on where the process starts and ends, which variants are included, and which related activities are explicitly excluded. This avoids scope creep and unrealistic expectations later in the implementation.
What teams actually do
- Identify and compare candidate processes
- Select one pilot with clear ownership and visible issues
- Define start/end points and success criteria
Example
Employee onboarding is selected because new hires frequently lack system access on their first day, the process involves HR, IT, facilities, and managers, and responsibilities are unclear across teams.
2. Establish governance, ownership, and working model
Before documenting anything, teams clarify how decisions will be made. This includes assigning a single end-to-end process owner, identifying contributors, and agreeing on approval and escalation rules. Without this clarity, documentation and improvement work quickly stalls.
Governance at this stage should be lightweight but explicit. The aim is not bureaucracy, but predictability—so everyone knows who is accountable, who contributes input, and how changes are handled once the process goes live.
What teams actually do
- Assign a process owner with decision authority
- Identify contributors and approvers
- Agree on review cadence and change rules
Example
HR is assigned as the onboarding process owner. IT and facilities contribute their steps. HR approves changes, with reviews scheduled quarterly or triggered by system changes.
3. Document and validate current-state processes
Teams document how the process actually works today, not how it should work. This is done through workshops, interviews, and walkthroughs with people who execute the process. Capturing variations and exceptions is critical, as these often explain delays and errors.
Validation ensures the documented process reflects reality. If participants do not recognize the model as accurate, adoption later will be low, regardless of how well the process is redesigned.
What teams actually do
- Run workshops with people executing the work
- Capture steps, handoffs, systems, and variations
- Validate the documented process with stakeholders
Example
In onboarding workshops, teams discover that laptop requests are triggered at different times depending on the manager, explaining why some new hires wait weeks for equipment.
4. Analyze issues and define KPIs
Once the current state is visible, teams analyze where the process fails to meet expectations. This includes delays, rework, unclear ownership, unnecessary approvals, and system gaps. Analysis should be evidence-based, using workshop findings, operational data, or execution logs where available.
KPIs are defined at this stage to reflect outcomes, not activities. Too many metrics create noise; a small set of meaningful KPIs provides focus and enables later evaluation of improvements.
What teams actually do
- Identify bottlenecks and root causes
- Review available performance data
- Define outcome-focused KPIs
Example
The onboarding team identifies delays in system access and duplicated data entry. KPIs are defined for time to productive start and access readiness on day one.
5. Redesign and standardize workflows
Redesign translates analysis into decisions about how work should be performed going forward. Teams remove unnecessary steps, clarify responsibilities, and define a clear sequence of activities. The focus is on simplicity, clarity, and maintainability.
Standardization does not remove flexibility. Teams define a default process and explicitly document where variations are allowed, so exceptions are visible and controlled rather than hidden.
What teams actually do
- Simplify steps and approvals
- Define a standard flow with allowed exceptions
- Agree on responsibilities and service levels
Example
The onboarding workflow is redesigned so IT provisioning always starts after contract signature, while allowing different equipment options for office and remote employees.
BPM Resources
Unlock hidden value in your business processes
Explore the results of our 'value challenge' initiative that demonstrates the hidden value organizations can uncover in their business processes by using BPM solutions.
A Practical Guide for Designing Optimal Business Processes
A modeling guidelines to help you create processes in a uniform way and present them comprehensibly for your whole team.
Process Mapping Basics
Find out how to get started with process mapping, and how to introduce business process management (BPM) concepts to your organization.
A Comprehensive Guide to Process Mining
Learn what process mining is, the value it offers, and why now is the right time to launch your own process mining initiative.
6. Implement improvements (manual and automated)
Implementation introduces redesigned processes into daily work. Some changes are procedural, such as updated responsibilities or clearer instructions. Others involve automation or system configuration. Teams decide deliberately which steps to automate based on volume, risk, and expected benefit.
Changes are introduced incrementally to reduce disruption and allow early correction. Clear communication explains what changed and why.
What teams actually do
- Update procedures and role descriptions
- Automate high-volume or error-prone steps
- Communicate changes clearly
Example
Standard account provisioning is automated for common roles, while non-standard access requests remain manual to avoid unnecessary complexity.
7. Configure tools and integrate with systems
Tools are configured to support the redesigned process. This includes publishing documentation, setting up workflows, defining access rights, and connecting BPM tools with operational systems where appropriate.
Tool configuration follows process design. Teams avoid changing the process simply to fit tool limitations, as this often creates long-term friction.
What teams actually do
- Publish the process in a shared repository
- Configure workflows and dashboards
- Set access rights and integrations
Example
The onboarding process is published centrally, workflows are configured for IT requests, and dashboards track onboarding KPIs.
8. Train teams and roll out changes
Training focuses on what people need to do differently. It is role-specific and practical, avoiding generic BPM theory. Clear communication explains the purpose of changes and sets expectations.
Rollout is planned to minimize disruption, especially for processes affecting many users.
What teams actually do
- Train users on their part of the process
- Provide short reference materials
- Communicate rollout timing and expectations
Example
Managers receive a short walkthrough on triggering onboarding, while new hires receive a clear onboarding timeline explaining what happens before and after their first day.
9. Monitor performance and refine
After rollout, teams monitor KPIs and collect feedback to see how the process performs in reality. Deviations between expected and actual performance are analyzed and addressed.
Refinement is expected. Small adjustments help stabilize the process and build trust in BPM practices.
What teams actually do
- Review KPIs regularly
- Gather feedback from users
- Adjust steps or responsibilities
Example
Data shows equipment delivery delays in one region, leading to a targeted adjustment without changing the global onboarding process.
10. Scale to additional processes
Once the pilot process is stable, the same approach is applied to additional processes. Standards, governance, templates, and lessons learned are reused to reduce effort and maintain consistency.
Scaling happens incrementally. Attempting to roll out BPM everywhere at once usually overwhelms teams and weakens governance.
What teams actually do
- Select the next process
- Reuse standards and templates
- Apply the same implementation steps
Example
After onboarding stabilizes, the organization applies the same approach to offboarding and internal role changes.
→ Related: The 3 Success Factors in BPM You Can't Miss
BPMN 2.0 poster
The uniform documentation of processes is vital for all organizations to provide a clear definition of responsibilities and manage key data in a structured manner. Our BPMN 2.0 poster offers daily support to document processes transparently, to avoid misunderstandings and to sustainably improve processes.
BPM implementation checklist
This checklist summarizes the essential actions required to implement BPM successfully. It is not meant to replace the implementation guide above, but to support teams in tracking progress and ensuring that critical steps are not missed.
Preparation and scope
☐ Clear reason for implementing BPM
☐ Expected outcomes defined (not just activities)
☐ Pilot process selected
☐ Process boundaries agreed
☐ Success criteria documented
Governance and ownership
☐ Single end-to-end process owner assigned
☐ Contributors and decision-makers identified
☐ Change approval rules defined
☐ Review cadence agreed
☐ Responsibility for maintaining documentation clarified
Process discovery and documentation
☐ Current-state process documented
☐ All handoffs and systems captured
☐ Variations and exceptions documented
☐ Process validated with people executing the work
Analysis and measurement
☐ Key bottlenecks and failure points identified
☐ Available data sources reviewed
☐ Baseline performance established
☐ Outcome-focused KPIs defined
Redesign and standardization
☐ Future-state process designed
☐ Unnecessary steps removed
☐ Responsibilities clarified
☐ Standard flow defined
☐ Allowed exceptions explicitly documented
Implementation and automation
☐ Manual process changes implemented
☐ Automation applied only where justified
☐ Exception handling agreed
☐ Changes communicated to affected teams
Tooling and integration
☐ Process published in a shared repository
☐ Access rights configured
☐ Workflows or dashboards set up where needed
☐ Integration dependencies understood
Training and rollout
☐ Role-specific training delivered
☐ Users informed about what changed
☐ Reference materials available
Monitoring and improvement
☐ KPIs reviewed on a regular cadence
☐ Feedback collected from users
☐ Improvements prioritized based on evidence
Scaling
☐ Lessons learned documented
☐ Standards and templates reused
☐ Next process selected
☐ Governance model reused for scale
Common BPM implementation challenges & how to address them
Even well-planned BPM implementations encounter obstacles. Most challenges are not caused by tools or methodology, but by unclear ownership, unrealistic scope, or weak integration into daily work.
Understanding these patterns helps teams anticipate issues and respond early.
1. Lack of clear ownership
When no single person is accountable for a process end to end, implementation work slows down. Decisions are postponed, documentation becomes outdated, and improvement efforts lose momentum.
How teams address it:
They assign one accountable process owner with clear decision rights and support that role with contributors from relevant teams. Ownership is treated as an operational responsibility, not an administrative label.
2. Starting with too much scope
Organizations often try to implement BPM across many processes at once. This creates complexity, overwhelms teams, and weakens governance before it has time to stabilize.
How teams address it:
They start with a small number of pilot processes, prove the approach, and expand gradually. Scaling follows demonstrated results, not ambition alone.
3. Documentation that doesn’t reflect reality
Processes are sometimes documented based on assumptions or outdated procedures. When teams do not recognize the documented process as accurate, adoption drops quickly.
How teams address it:
They validate documentation with people who perform the work and revisit models after changes. Accuracy is prioritized over completeness in early stages.
4. Resistance to change
New processes often fail because teams do not understand why changes are introduced or how they affect daily work. Resistance is usually passive rather than explicit.
How teams address it:
They involve practitioners early, explain the purpose of changes, and focus training on what is different rather than BPM concepts. Feedback loops remain open after rollout.
5. Overengineering and overautomation
Automation is sometimes introduced too early or applied to unstable processes. This increases complexity and makes later changes harder.
How teams address it:
They stabilize and standardize processes first, then automate selectively where volume or risk justifies it. Manual steps remain acceptable when automation adds little value.
6. Weak measurement and follow-through
Without clear KPIs and review routines, teams cannot tell whether implementation efforts improve performance. Improvements remain anecdotal and short-lived.
How teams address it:
They define a small number of outcome-focused KPIs, review them regularly, and use data to prioritize refinements. Measurement becomes part of governance, not a one-time task.
7. BPM treated as a one-time project
Some organizations treat BPM implementation as something to “finish.” Once the initial rollout ends, processes stagnate and documentation becomes outdated.
How teams address it:
They embed BPM into regular operating routines, assign responsibility for maintenance, and align improvement cycles with business priorities. BPM becomes part of how work is managed, not an initiative that ends.
A Practical Way to Build Your Optimal Business Processes
Get the most important standards, ready for you to modify and adapt according to your own organizational needs.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you know when BPM should be implemented?
BPM should be implemented when processes are inconsistent, difficult to scale, or lack transparency. Common signals include recurring delays, unclear ownership, manual workarounds, or improvement initiatives that do not sustain results.
How do you implement BPM?
How do you implement BPM workflows for process improvement?
Who should lead BPM implementation?